Empowerment is the Only Way to Go.

 After thirty five years, I am back, full circle.  I saw this T-Shirt last week, worn by a worker on a  Fair Trade certified Banana Plantation,  employing 700 workers on a permanent full time basis in Ghana.  I was deeply moved by the T-shirt. Here is the story…

Forty year ago when working for De Beers Mines, just before the end of Apartheid, we formed the Limes Acres Discussion group,  a partnership between Mine Management and the National Union of Mine workers to explore post Apartheid South Africa.  It was part of the mine’s Strategic Five Year plan to empower and develop workers. 

 A Five Year Plan which changed so much for so manyThe Lime Acres discussion group were my first steps in discovering the power of people and what is possible through genuine collaboration, inclusion and focused dialogue. Well done Robin Mills, Rudolf De Beer, Godfrey Oliphant, Rupert Besent (deceased), Jeremy Wyeth and Archie Luhlabo.

As part of the Strategic Plan we started looking for leadership potential among workers.  The idea of finding potential in youngsters led to a venture much later in Australia aimed at identifying and developing young high potential individuals at risk youngsters. Thanks Kate Madden.

Looking for young high potentials who are at risk

With the march of time I became deeply involved in the business world.  Many of my clients were high tech financial services such as banks, insurance, ITC communications, and high profile individuals.  As we restructured, right sized, brought in hi-tech solutions and worked with elite talent pools,  I lost sight of worker empowerment.  

I forgot its critical importance for humanity’s development.  I fell into the trap of thinking trickle down economics worked, that the modern workplace had any other real interest then profits (market driven profit and short termism) and that technology would help solve the big problems of overpopulation, and climate change. 

However, let me give credit to some visionary CEOs and Chair who took the risk of shareholder displeasure with the bigger picture view.  It is a pleasure to have worked with Gareth Ackerman, Mike Hawker, Guy Winship and Prof Muhammed Yunus

Now as the debate shifts to AI, billionaire and fascist autocracy, climate change, plus conspiracy theories, workers become increasingly lost in the noise.

Time as a board trustee for the Global Eco village Network (GEN), helped restore reality.  I helped pioneer and market first world European eco-villages (Narara Ecovillage, Tasman Ecovillage) and made regular visits to Findhorn and Damanhur. I recall Kosha Joubert, then CEO of GEN saying there are millions of villages in the global South and North who are not first world, who needed help to reinvigorate their village and the rural landscape.  So sad all her work at the COPs to make Eco-villages center to rural generation failed due to leadership at the wrong level of complexity.

Full Circle

Protecting People at Work – 35 years ago this message was as relevant as today.

In 2022 the then Chair of Fairtrade International,  asked me to work with the board. This opportunity gave me a chance to visit workers in farms ranging from small producers to plantations.  Thank you Lynette Thorstenson and current Chair, Laurence Tainty.

I have just returned from a board meeting in Ghana and was privileged to visit farm workers near Accra and Kumasi.  It was here I saw the ‘Empowered Worker, Productive Worker‘ T shirt.  I heard from the workers first hand how Fairtrade’s certification has made a difference to their lives. I experienced this in Sri Lanka, Mexico and Kenya.

I do urge you to consider buying Fairtrade products, its direct action that helps workers. If your retail outlet doesn’t stock them. ask them to do so.  It gives workers dignity, opportunity and the ladder for self development, both for themselves and their communities.

In 2024 I formed Neos Delta with a circle of influential and caring friends.  Our aim is to foster long term thinking, empowerment and accountability to living our best lives.    That’s why we are run interesting and eclectic workshops for Boards who see different visions of the futureLeaders who want to work with a Long View and for all of us, Living your Best Life.

Conclusion

If you are in the position of leverage, be it an organisation or a board, consider how you can make a difference to people’s lives and planet health.  If you are working for an organisation, choose one with a purpose for greater good.  It is not only rewarding, its empowering and provides a sense of greater purpose, both for you and workers.  Remember doing good is good business.

Time Span and Time Horizon? Logical Extensions – Elliott Jaques revisited.

Just to keep this simple,  the original concept of Levels (then called Strata) came from the work of Dr Elliott Jaques (EJ),  originally conceived  in the heyday of the factory and mass production.  This meta model has continued evolving over more then 70 years and now, it is more relevant than ever. Why?

Volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity is the answer, plus climate change.  Not only corporate and governments MUST be accountable for long term planning and decision making, but all enterprises.  That means all prosumers (consumers and producers. (1)  It is not a luxury.  The 2.5 degree temperature rise is now the best scenario. As Harari says(2), ‘yet with all this information circulating at breathtaking speed, humanity is closer than ever to annihilating itself.’  Despoliation is unchecked.

Work Themes or Levels of Work (LoW), deals with increasing world in decision making.  It uses Time and Unique Value Adding as a differentiator between levels;.  This natural hierarchy is not about rigidity, power, control or prestige, the normal associated bullsh*t. 

Hand in hand with the Themes/Levels of Work, EJ used Time Span to sharpen the mind in order to estimate the work complexity involved.  He defined this to be the time to completion of the most complex task in a role… or the time that elapses before the Managerial Leader at the level above can see the completion of the task.  Thus work with similar time spans to completion belong in the same work theme/level of work complexity.

Very few people are able to think in long time –  we find making long term decisions really challenging and secondly, the market rewards short termism, measured by growth. Assistance is useful. Time span is a tool to help one think longer term.  It is  still a relevant measure as it’s about the complexity of work being undertaken in specific tasks. Consider it takes a few years to build a bridge, or to transform an enterprise using a new platform, or build an aircraft; yet it takes only a few months to sell real estate or half an hour for a dentist to fill a tooth. Yet it does not address consequences or impact.

What must be addressed for all goal directed work systems, is the issue of consequence or accountability for decision making. 

Not only internally, but to the broader community with which the enterprise impacts – directly or indirectly. That is tough.  How?  Returning to structure,  Time Span is a serious tool for gauging work complexity, but it is no dashboard of consequence once the task is complete. Technology has definitely impacted the relevance of Time Span in the first three operational work themes, while those at executive levels argue that it is impossible to plan longer term.  The best one can do is to build  organisational resilience.  This is a leadership fail, equivalent to fence sitting. 

While challenging, the impact of technology or short term market demands does not release us from accountability for thinking long term of consequences

 Time Span needs to be made more relevant to the current discourse of accountability. In practice, Time Span works well for operational roles, but becomes less relevant at the work themes of Corporate Citizenship (Level VI) and Corporate Prescience (Level VII).  In  Organisation Design (3)  I argued then that Time Span is no longer a fitting measure for work at the executive levels of enterprises or for state functions. 

Time Span is not about trying to envision the future.

Envisioning the impacts is referred to as the Time Horizon(4).

 A more suitable measure for these work themes is that of impact, namely Time Horizon.  I defined this in 2013 as;

“the amount of elapsed time before the outcome(s)  of the most complex decision can be confirmed.”

This by definition implies applying the mind systemically to envision all possible outcomes of the decision.  Time horizon may also be defined as: that distance into the future to which a decision-maker looks when evaluating the consequences of a proposed action.(4) This extends the functionality of the Time Span concept.  It allows for risk assessment by multiple stakeholders.  We should not do is confuse the terms. (5)  Jaques used Time Horizon to describe the individual future thinking capability. I have co-opted the term to use in planning and future envisaging, as a necessary extension to Time Span, as the onus now shifts to people, going beyond task completion.

 

What I struggle with is accountability.  How do you hold a board and CEO accountable for outcomes in a ten, twenty or thirty of forty year or more Time Horizon?  As we know, boards, CEOs and executive teams of large companies are not built for the long haul. How can they be accountable when we know with a 100% certainty they will not be there to answer for their decisions in as short a time as five to seven years?(5)

It is widely acknowledged that complexity of board work has grown.  A recent survey by Mckinsey & Company (6) of board members reported board members felt strategic activities require more active and regular board involvement. Examples were in the fields of linking strategy to purpose, assessing managements understanding of the drivers of value creation. The article was silent on long term consequences.

Accountability should be to stakeholders on the quality of thinking that made up the Time Horizon analysis.  Problem is of course, rewards are thin for long term thinking or planning.  So that leaves us in an uncomfortable place. Damned if we do, and damned if we don’t.

A practical answer is we need to assume responsibility for longer term thinking in our own Life;  how we work, how we consume, how we influence, our activism, how we vote. Secondly, if you are leader think longer, work in longer time, its a duty of human care. Its not a luxury any longer.  Governance needs to evolve to a point where Time Horizons become part of the boards compliance duty and requires stakeholder approval and shared accountability for the future.

Time Horizons are part of board governance.

 

Reference.

1. Tofler, Alvin., (1999).,  Third Wave.  refers to producers/consumers.

2 Harari, YN (2024)  Nexus.  page xx.  Prologue.

3. Olivier, Andrew.  Organisational Design. What your University Forgot to Teach You.  (2013)

4. I could not find this specific quote as the site was updated 21/07/24.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_horizon

5.  Confusing Time Horizons and  Time Span is fairly common, see Elliot Jaques’ Concept of Time-Horizon | xraydelta 

5. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.  Average C suite tenure is 4.9 years and CEO 5- 7.2 years   August 4, 2023.

6.  Huber, C., Lund, Fritjhof., Spielman, N.,  Better together; Three ways to boost board-CEO collaboration.  Sept 25, 2024. Survey.